Author Archives: Jake Fishman
A Direct Question
It’s been hard to ignore the growing buzz surrounding the printing industry’s direct sales organizations during last several weeks as news of downsizing and branch closures placed a spotlight on the sustainability of the business model. Highlighted among the recent events were the transfer of Ricoh’s branches and commercial accounts in four Mississippi and Alabama metros to RJ Young and the sale of Canon Business Solutions Canada’s Halifax, Nova Scotia branch to local dealer Xtra Document Solutions. While questions regarding many manufacturers’ direct sales businesses have existed for decades, these events provided dealers and industry watchers with rare “proof” of this vulnerability.
Canon and Ricoh colored their recent moves as part of an effort to better support their local client bases, while those in the analyst community were quick to notice the economic similarities of these regions and the growing pressure that manufacturers are facing to stay profitable. Dealers, however, had a different perspective on these moves. After years of lamenting their role in subsidizing OEMs’ direct sales operations, dealers quickly latched on to these events as their own Tahrir Square. It was a confirmation that their complaints were not unfounded and a sign that the power was on its way back to the people, or in this case, the partners.
After years of aggressively expanding their direct presence, sometimes with market share goals taking precedence over profitability, it appears that some manufacturers have begun to reevaluate their direct sales strategy (and not just Canon and Ricoh). Over the years, many vendors’ direct sales investments were largely driven by the promise that any short term sacrifices made to grow their presence and install base would eventually be justified by ongoing click annuities and future incumbent sales advantages. In line with this strategy, the last ten years have brought a procession of branch openings into smaller and smaller metros, very aggressive acquisitions, painful organizational integrations, and drawn-out install base conversions. Meanwhile, many direct organizations matched their geographic migration with a similar expansion of their target markets, which for some direct sales groups now range from any company that could afford a single copier all the way up to the largest enterprises.
Not surprisingly, news of direct downsizing was greeted by dealers with a mix of celebration and self-congratulation. Dealers of course know the cost of selling and servicing MFPs and the challenges associated with acquiring another dealer, but could never figure out how their direct sales competitors could a turn a profit. Actually, most dealers were pretty darn sure that many direct branches were not profitable at all. With each bid they lost to their various direct rivals, who were offering prices and CPCs below the dealer’s own wholesale costs, many of these down-the-street capitalists began to see the OEM-direct relationship as closer to socialism (gasp!). That may just be the loud voice of the channel’s Tea Party minority, but even more moderate resellers saw it as factory economics at best. The dealers provided their vendors with profits, the direct branches gave the US subsidiaries revenue and volume, and together they provided the factory in Japan with revenue, profit, and manufacturing scale. Of course, it’s not that simple and I have no doubt that the majority of direct organizations see profit as a huge priority, but these branches are closing for a reason.

In terms of sales growth, the direct organizations’ expansion tactics have actually worked quite well over the years, making direct sales the main revenue driver for most vendors. Unfortunately, there is a catch to this expansion strategy. It only works when the market is expanding and when manufacturers are generating enough profit to incubate their direct sales initiatives. And with 2011’s incredible combination of a continued recession, flattened page volumes, natural disasters, and currency pressures, signs suggest that vendors can no longer wait to collect on their direct sales investments.
While anecdotal at this point, it is very likely that manufacturer direct organizations will continue to shift away from smaller metros and clients, relying on partners to target these opportunities. And for very good reasons. Servicing any size account costs 10 to 12 percent more through a direct branch than through a reseller, and SMBs simply do not provide the scale to offset these costs. So once the priority shifts from generating revenue and growing install bases to making a profit, SMB-heavy branches are the first to go. The question is, are vendors merely pruning rural branches and addressing acquired redundancies (this has been going on for a while), or will market and financial realities force vendors to rethink how they sell to SMBs in general.
The good news for any over-extended manufacturer direct organization is there are some solid businesses cases to model their transitions after.
HP and Lexmark may call their direct groups’ enterprise focus a channel-friendly gesture, but the truth is they have no interest in chasing SMB sales. In fact, HP has made it quite clear that it doesn’t even want to support the SMB clients it already has, doling out accounts to partners upon the 2010 launch of QuickPage in Europe and more recently transferring its acquired Printelligent client base to resellers in the US.
Xerox essentially invented the industry’s direct channel, but has clearly set its direct sales sights on the largest enterprises, while relying on its dealer-style Global Imaging Systems branches and scale-appropriate Agents and resellers to support smaller regional clients. And just to make it official, Xerox began transferring its remaining SMB and regional accounts to Global last summer, effectively right-sizing its direct client base and firmly establishing each organization’s target market.
It is probably no coincidence that the three manufacturers with the least pressure to keep the factory churning out MFPs and cartridges also have the best-defined direct sales strategies. However, Lexmark, HP, and Xerox’s profit goals are not unique from any other vendor and there is nothing stopping other industry players from doing the same.
I’m not suggesting that every direct organization should shift all of its attention to the Fortune 1000. I’m also not suggesting that we’ve seen the last of channel acquisitions, as there have been more acquisitions in the last twelve months than in 2009 and 2010 combined.
However, I do believe that the trend away from less developed regions and smaller end-user companies is a good one and most direct organizations would benefit from better-defining their target markets. I also believe that the direct sales business model and the direct rep compensation model has to shift from revenue to profit.
It’s a changing world and the printing industry’s sales and distribution structure has to change with it.
I guess we’ll see in the next few years who agrees.
Gap Intelligence’s 2011 Printing Industry Year in Review
As we wind down the year, I think it is safe to say that 2011 was an interesting one for the print industry. Between the impact of currency, natural disasters, recessions, and civil unrest, it was hard at times to not view the market as snakebit, but in my opinion all of those hopefully short-term events took second stage to some very interesting technology and channel trends. And the opportunities provided by these transitions suggest that 2012 will be a fun one.
With that, and in honor of the SportsCenter Top Ten List, which reminds us each night that it doesn’t matter if you win or lose, it’s how you look in the highlights, I give you the top ten printing themes, trends, and events of 2011.
10# Inkjet Technology
Yes Inkjet Technology. While some readers with a strict office focus may be surprised to see inkjet technology crack the top ten, it had a major impact on the 2011 printing market from a variety of angles and promises to do the same for years to come.
It wasn’t more than a week into 2011 that I stumbled upon my first Memjet printer, quickly snapping photos and jotting down specs before the Chupacabra of the printing industry ran off into the Nevada desert. But this time, the page-wide array freak of nature was here to stay. The debut of Lenovo’s Memjet-based RJ600N at CES was really the first in a procession of partnership announcements and product launches throughout 2011, targeting a variety of uses with a focus on smaller and emerging markets. And although Memjet’s 2011 impact was not as big as the buzz it created, the company and its technology showed plenty of potential for 2012 and beyond, especially as it partners with larger vendors and begins selling into established markets.

2011 also brought the second generation of Xerox’s solid ink-based ColorQube series, providing modest spec changes, but interesting adjustments to its hardware cost and highly-touted CPC structure (in opposite directions). Although the ColorQube series hasn’t changed the game yet, this year brought the first evidence of electro photostatic vendors testing their own hybrid billing capabilities, suggesting that the line’s tiered billing plan certainly captured competitors’ attention.
Inkjet technology continued to have a huge impact on the production market in 2011, as inkjet systems increased in number and brand, while approaching size and pricing levels that made the technology applicable to more mainstream commercial printers. We also saw the printing industry’s household names bring inkjet technology further into their strategy, as Ricoh finally began its integration of InfoPrint, Konica Minolta signed on a Screen Trupress reseller, and Canon’s Oce portfolio expanded to include everything except continuous feed, but its new VPS imagePRESS models at least allowed them to sell into the same Prismasync environments. Last but not least was Xerox’s new waterless ink-based CiPress 500 system, which touts an interesting value proposition based on its ability to print on lower-cost plain paper, and drew a heck of a crowd at Graph Expo.
Meanwhile the “enterprise” inkjet AiO segment continued to shine as a bright spot for inkjet vendors. Although the inkjet players’ definition of “enterprise” is a bit different than my friends’ in the MFP or MPS worlds, these SOHO-class devices were a bright spot for vendors. Enterprise inkjets still make up a relatively small piece of the inkjet pie and face some challenges sneaking their low ink yields and paper capacities past IT managers. However, there is no doubt that the segment offers both steady revenue and profit growth now and in the coming years, making it a potentially disruptive force for low-end color laser technology.
#9 The Yen
Like my 2010 list the nine spot is devoted to the strength of the yen. And like last year, most manufacturers would agree that the yen had as big of an impact on their financial performance as any other event or trend. Although out of mind for many, the strength of the yen has impacted almost all of us including the Japanese manufacturers selling to the West, the US subsidiaries that have to negotiate with Japan, the many Western vendors who source engines from Japan, and the dealers and end-users that pay more because of it. Now more than ever, it’s a global economy.

In fact, with the yen at 77 to the dollar, the 84 yen to the dollar days of 2010 are looking pretty good right now.
8# Global Imaging Gets Aggressive
Xerox’s Global Imaging Systems subsidiary has arguably been the most active direct sales organization in recent years, executing a number of high-profile acquisitions throughout the recession, but 2011 brought some moves that made previous years seem quite conservative.

Like previous years, GIS proved to be the most aggressive US sales subsidiary, acquiring six dealers between April and August. However, it was during this acquisition spree that Global began pursuing a new avenue for growth. In early August gap intelligence learned that Xerox had begun transferring a number of its smaller direct accounts to GIS branches in 15 metros in a move that was intended to right-size its direct sales client base, while expanding the footprint of the targeted GIS branches. Xerox has since colored this transition as the first step towards a new reorganized direct sales structure that will allow its direct operations to focus on larger GDO (Global Document Outsourcing) accounts and GIS branches to serve clients on a more intimate local level.
Considering that servicing any size account costs 10 to 12 percent more through a direct organization than through a dealer-style organization (like Global) and that SMBs do not provide the scale to offset these costs, this move makes a lot of sense. Xerox of course did not invent this strategy, as similar economic motivations drove HP EMEA to transfer numerous direct accounts to its partners in preparation for its 2010 QuickPage launch, and will cause it to do the same with its acquired Printelligent accounts. However, Global’s positioning as Xerox’s SMB-focused direct organization provides the vendor with a unique ability to shed less-profitable smaller accounts from its enterprise direct division, while still keeping the business in the family. That said, I’d bet Xerox’s partners and agents would prefer HP’s version.
Global also proved that it is willing to invest in talent in addition to dealerships, as the sales subsidiary landed recently-departed Kyocera Mita America CEO Michael Pietrunti in August, appointing him to the position of senior vice president responsible for acquisitions, corporate service, and marketing. And given Pietrunti’s experience at Kyocera Mita and Sharp, the new GIS executive arrives with a unique knowledge of where some hidden opportunities exist and should be motivated to take advantage of a level of acquisition funding that was not available to him in his previous role.
7# March 11, 2011
In addition to the terrible human impact, the earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan on March 11, 2011 served as arguably the most significant outside influence on the printing market this year. The immediate impact of the earthquake and tsunami were quite visible as manufacturing plants quickly shut down due to structural damage from the earthquake and stayed closed as power, workforce, and infrastructure challenges lingered.
While initial levels of transparency regarding the impact of the disaster varied by manufacturer, nearly all vendors eventually admitted that inventory shortfalls were expected. Before long, dealers began experiencing these shortages first hand and messaging from the manufacturers shifted from maintaining a steady flow of new MFPs to keep pace with demand, to a more pragmatic goal of keeping sufficient inventories of key supplies and maintenance items in stock to ensure support for their current install bases.
Unfortunately, despite impressive efforts to get plants up and running, shortages of key parts kept many manufacturers from producing complete MFPs for some time, impacting inventories of specific product lines for as long as six months. While inventories of more sophisticated MFP systems were most impacted, we also identified significant shortages of laser printers and inkjet MFPs, as many “active” products were listed as backordered by May 2011, and by June 2011 channel inventories were nearly 70 percent lower than levels at the same time in 2010.
Looking back, vendors were able to successfully support their current fleets, and although the financial impact was still severe, by the start of the fourth quarter it appeared everything was back on track. I will leave it at that, and hopefully won’t have to include the impact of the Thailand flooding in my 2012 retrospective.
#6 – It’s a Long Way From the Top
To the delight of early Occupy Wall Street protesters, 2011 proved to be a bad year for the print industry’s leadership, as top US executives from Sharp, Kyocera Mita, and Ricoh vacated their respective offices between June 1 and July 25.

Sharp led-off this trend as Ed McLaughlin stepped-down after nine years as SIIC’s CEO in June. While Sharp made a number of management adjustments in the weeks preceding McLaughlin’s resignation, perhaps in preparation for this move, the vendor became the last to actually fill its executive vacancy, when it named former American Express and Samsung executive, Doug Albregts, to the role in late November.
July brought the departure of Ricoh U.S. President and CEO Jeff Hickling. However, rather than naming a replacement, Ricoh Americas Chairman and CEO Kevin Togashi eliminated the position, assuming control of all U.S. sales and operations. This move both followed and preceded a number of other executive announcements and departures at Ricoh, that initially brought an influx of IKON’s leadership into Ricoh’s executive ranks, but has since evened out.
By late July, Kyocera Mita America President and CEO, Michael Pietrunti resigned to pursue other interests. Kyocera Mita was able fill KMA’s president role with Kyocera Mita veteran Norihiko Ina within three weeks, but by late August Pietrunti emerged in a senior vice president role at Xerox’s Global Imaging Subsidiary, suggesting that this may be the one departure that was voluntary. Or at the very least, Mr. Pietrunti was the most successful at landing on his feet.
#6b – Leo and Tito’s Summer to Forget
Going into the 2011 season, things were looking-up for my favorite baseball team and one of my favorite vendors. The Boston Red Sox tore a few more pages out of its checkbook during the offseason, compiling one its strongest teams in years and emerging as an early title favorite. Meanwhile, HP began the year with significant momentum, under the leadership of a new CEO and touting a new ecosystem strategy, intriguing cloud and tablet roadmaps, and enjoying a big head-start in the MPS and mobile printing arenas.
However, neither Red Sox manager Terry “Tito” Francona nor HP CEO Leo Apotheker would be around to lead their respective teams into 2012. And their exits were not pretty. So unattractive, in fact, that they are best communicated in a timeline.
Leo and Tito Timeline:
March 9, 2011 – HP reveals plans to install WebOS on every PC it ships, touts the strategic advantage of its ecosystem ambitions, and increases dividend by 50 percent
March 31, 2011 – Red Sox welcomed home from positive Spring Training by a front page headline on the always sensational Boston Herald, touting them as the best Sox squad ever.
April 16, 2011 – Red Sox start 2-10, Dustin Pedroia reminds everyone that it’s a 162 game season.
May 17, 2011- HP cuts full-year forecast on poor PC demand
May 24, 2011 – HP acquires Printelligent, setting stage for major channel MPS overhaul
May 31, 2011 – Red Sox surge throughout May, climb to 35-25
July 1, 2011 – HP launches TouchPad, with significant fanfare
July 31, 2011 – Red Sox go 20-6 for July, everyone is happy.
August 1, 2011 - The TouchPad expands to 11th retailer, giving HP a second place 12 percent Tablet shelf share.
August 18, 2011 – HP reveals plans to acquire Autonomy for $10.3 billion, discontinue all WebOS products (including tablets), and evaluate sale or spin-off PC unit, PSG.
August 31, 2011 – Pitchers Josh Beckett, Jon Lester, and John Lackey eat chicken – Lackey double-checks his contract for a weight clause
September 22, 2011 – HP fires Leo and names Meg Whitman as CEO.
September 28, 2011 – Red Sox lose 18 of final 24 games to miss playoffs by one game
September 30, 2011 - Tito Francona resigns under pressure from management. Bostonians tell each other “wait till next year”, watch the Francona smear campaign in disgust, and thank god for the Patriots.
The good news for HP is Meg Whitman quickly did her best to reverse everything she could and appears to have brought the company back on course. And although both teams are back to “waiting till next year,” HP and Red Sox fans alike are not overly optimistic to think that next year could be worth the wait. Both teams have a solid fan base, a strong lineup, plenty of talent, and no shortage of money – all of which are vital in succeeding in both business and baseball.
In other good news, this is the last of 2011’s top ten that could be viewed as a negative event.
# 5 – A4 Push Continues
A4 MFPs maintained their momentum in 2011, as key market trends continued to play in the segment’s favor and remaining traditional A3 players finally brought their own “copier brand” enterprise A4s to market.
This trend began with a trickle of relatively unambitious copier brand A4 desktops starting roughly ten years ago, followed-by Sharp’s Frontier experiment in 2008 and 2009, but 2011 finally brought the first truly enterprise-class A4s from Ricoh, Canon, Konica Minolta (in Europe), and Fuji Xerox (in Asia). And although US versions of the new Konica Minolta and Fuji Xerox (via Xerox) models have yet to materialize and more enterprise A4s from traditional A3 vendors are surely on the way, the last eighteen months still brought a 35 percent increase in active “copier brand” A4 MFPs while the same vendors’ active A3 lines consolidated by 3.5 percent.

There is no doubt that each of these trends will continue, given the roles of MPS and emerging markets on most vendors’ priority lists and in light of ongoing page volume trends. This shift is very exciting (at least to me), and should be seen with significant anticipation among vendors and dealers looking to gain share as the transition creates new opportunities.
However, questions still remain regarding how these “copier” vendors plan to use their growing A4 portfolios. Ironically, the primary goal for many of these highly-anticipated A4 models is to protect the vendors’ A3 install bases, despite the many factors that prompted them to expand within the A4 segments in the first place. Given the traditional “copier” players current install bases and channel structures, it is hard not to blame them for using these highly-anticipated models for more tactical purposes, but there is little doubt that the market will be far kinder to vendors that embrace a more organic A4 strategy going forward. Meanwhile, the traditional “printer” players that have been cleaning-up by providing dealers with A4 supplements to their A3-centric lines had better begin preparing for far more well-rounded competition from their copier-player adversaries.
#4 The Wild West of Cloud & Mobile
Prompted by the emergence of tablets and the growing mainstream relevance of cloud computing, OEMs and third party vendors rushed cloud and mobile printing solutions to the market in 2011 to ensure connectivity with the new frontiers of the network. While 2011 will surely be viewed as the early days of cloud and mobile printing, the technologies have come a long way since last year, when cloud and mobile were also the #4 theme on gap’s list, but the number and capabilities of available solutions were far less impressive.

In the last year, the cloud and mobile printing market went from a handful of offerings from HP, Xerox, and Ricoh, who were met halfway by industry outsiders like Google and Apple, as well as third parties such as EFI and Cortado. After a busy 2011, mobile print offerings are available from nearly every vendor and a growing number of cloud printing and scanning solutions have emerged across product lines and pipelines.
Now what this trend needs is one of the quickest standardizations in history, as the idea of several dozen proprietary solutions gaining acceptance in today’s mixed-fleet, mobile, and interconnected environments will not work. One possible step towards this standardization may have occurred in October, when HP took a page out of its 1984 playbook and allowed Toshiba to add ePrint to its MPS offering. Twenty-seven years after HP’s Printer Command Language (PCL) became the desktop printing standard, paving the way for network printing as we know it, ePrint (aka ePCL) could be headed the same direction. However, it is extremely doubtful that competing vendors are willing to hand that to HP just yet, suggesting that standardization could be driven through the current loosely assembled cloud printing alliances or even a widely-partnered third party such as EFI. Either way, before standardization happens, 2012 is sure to bring its share of new mobile and cloud printing developments, let’s just hope that the actual act of cloud and mobile printing grows at a similar rate.
4# – Tablets
The impact of tablets will of course go way beyond the above mentioned race to build the best mobile and cloud printing solutions. In just 18 months tablets have changed the way many consumers and workers view and communicate information, and will certainly change their preferences regarding how and what they print. The same can be said for marketers and publishers, who now have yet another alternative and often lower cost means of electronically reaching customers.
Who knows, it could be a fad…

While convenience and value were already keys to the office and commercial print value proposition, these two factors will play an even greater role going forward as tablets continue to penetrate the home and office.
Despite device consolidation and centralization’s role as a cornerstone MFP and MPS sales strategy, tablets could very likely drive a device decentralization trend, as the idea of a tablet-equipped worker hiking across the office to wait in line for their job at the centralized copier seems highly unlikely. And if that print-out is intended for mere convenience purposes, it might not even happen in the first place.
On the production printing side, mobility has initially hit offset printing the hardest, but production vendors and print service providers are placing a similar focus on convenience and value, ranging from how jobs are ordered and produced, how they can be personalized, and how they can link their output back to the mobile device, ensuring that the printed page plays a key role in the digital ecosystem.
As part of my obligation to the industry, I have to note that the increased penetration of tablets will create billions of new pages of printable data, now the industry just has to fulfill its obligation to ensure that these prints can be made as conveniently and with as much value as possible.
# 2 – Channel MPS
Channel MPS was a major trend throughout the year, as vendors hustled to assemble and launch new programs with the intentions of guiding their partners’ transformation into MPS providers and further strengthening their channel relationships. Needless to say, Channel MPS has been a learning experience for many vendors, some of which have struggled trying to find the right balance between their resellers’ needs and their own. And although it’s likely that many vendors will finds plenty of ways to improve on their 2011 channel MPS offerings, the year certainly brought a number honest attempts to find that balance. While a number of vendors launched or expanded their channel MPS offerings this year, including notable moves from Canon and Muratec, the most aggressive channel MPS initiatives came from HP, Xerox, and Ricoh.
Xerox bookended its well-received PagePack 3.0 offering with the introduction of its eConcierge and XPPS programs to US dealers. While not exactly MPS, eConcierge provides resellers with a co-branded e-commerce portal, through which their clients can order genuine supplies for all Xerox and non-Xerox devices and receive free service for Xerox models with continued consumable orders. Perhaps more importantly, eConcierge introduces partners to more consultative print service practices, in hopes of bringing its less sophisticated resellers up the value chain. Xerox also began the US introduction of its mid-market focused XPPS program, filling-out the high-end of its US channel MPS offering. First launched in Europe last year, XPPS is essentially a suite of tools that are largely based on components of Xerox’s own direct MPS offering combined with recent acquisition Newfield IT’s Asset DB program, encompassing nearly every component of an mid-market MPS engagement including sales and leasing, discovery and monitoring, assessment and optimization, service, etc. With the two new offerings, Xerox’s often referred-to “MPS Continuum” claim now has far more clout on the channel-side than before and at the very least, should help to recruit new resellers, grow the capabilities of existing resellers, and fortify the vendor’s channel sales ecosystem.
2011 also brought the launch of Ricoh’s chaMPS program, significantly expanding its channel MPS offering. The chaMPS program is based around the same core change management and continuous improvement themes that Ricoh introduced through its direct MDS program two years ago and provides its already-established methodologies, resources, and services through a variety of free and fee-based a la carte options. While Ricoh is certainly not the first vendor to offer its dealers a turnkey MPS/MDS program, chaMPS is arguably among the most complete in terms of the scope of features provided. However, it also appears to carry the most up-front cost requirements, which certainly raised some alarm among the dealers, and the variety of components appears to have created a new challenge, as dealers initially struggled to ascertain which chaMPS components were essential and which were “nice to haves.” That said, in the spirit of Ricoh’s continuous improvement MPS philosophy, the vendor will surely continue to refine its channel MPS initiative as we move into 2012.
HP’s channel MPS moves were largely internal in 2011, but should have a significant impact on how the vendor supports its partners going forward. Kick-started by its acquisition of Printelligent in May, HP’s Laserjet Enterprise Services (LES) division has undergone quite a transformation, combining Printelligent’s personnel, toolsets, and processes with its own to create the new HP Partner Print Services unit. And while the new unit did not make its first impact on the channel until November when HP introduced its first Partner Print Services offering to resellers, more programs with a mix of Printelligent, LES, and HP Managed Enterprise Solutions (Enterprise Direct) DNA is surely forthcoming.
# 1 – Transition to Services
Once again honored with the top spot in gap intelligence’s annual printing industry review is the transition to services that is taking place across the industry. Considering that we celebrated IBM’s 100th year in existence in 2011, marked by more than a few noteworthy services transformations, it would be inaccurate for me to call this a new trend, but the changes in 2011 were certainly unique and very telling of where we are headed.
With the benefits of previous service expansions by IBM well-proven, and the results of similar moves from HP and Xerox growing increasingly clear, 2011 brought an influx of non-printing services activity from vendors across the market, resulting more than a few reorganizations, acquisitions, and rebranding initiatives. Heck, even the self-proclaimed MPS “thought leaders” began building-up their enterprise services and solutions credentials. And why wouldn’t they? Services present significant opportunities for vendors to grow their business and creates a bridge to what they hope is where the future will be.
Canon and Konica Minolta’s US subsidiaries executed two of the most interesting services expansions of 2011, proving each with a new path beyond printing and imaging and the prospect of an even more interesting level of independence.

Konica Minolta started the year with its January acquisition of managed IT services provider All Covered, adding the 22-location SMB-focused provider to its largely SMB-focused direct and indirect printing sales and service force. Within its first year as a Konica Minolta subsidiary, All Covered expanded to five additional markets through acquisitions, which is even more notable when contrasted with the vendor’s single US dealer acquisition. While Konica Minolta has provided few details on cross-selling activity between its IT and print client bases, the vendor originally revealed that it plans to follow a playbook that is very similar to how it operated the Hughes Callahan integration. The company reports that it was able to successfully migrate about 80-percent of Hughes Callahan’s IT services clients to Konica Minolta-brand output solutions. Therefore, the believed plan going forward is to introduce the All Covered team to Konica Minolta customers and vice versa. Meanwhile, Konica Minolta indicated that it would provide All Covered’s IT services through its authorized dealers, allowing these partners to expand their offering to their clients.

Canon USA took a different route in its services transition, opening the largely mid-market and enterprise-focused Canon Information & Imaging Solutions (CIIS) subsidiary without the aid of any acquisitions, while maintaining a connection to its imaging heritage. The primary focus of CIIS is to accelerate the growth of Canon’s service and solutions, first through expanding its document solutions business into IT services, followed by the commercialization of Canon’s cloud, medical imaging, display, and “new” technologies. And although Canon made this ambitious move without acquiring an existing provider, the vendor is certainly not going it alone, as much of its cloud infrastructure is based on technology from its long-time partner Fujitsu and two of its early offerings come as a result from its partnerships with SalesForce and Oracle. Although Canon surely has cross-selling in mind, and will see an immediate print benefit from the Salesforce offering, the vendor is still evaluating how the printed page fits into its CIIS roadmap and appears quite pragmatic regarding how it will be sold, careful not to jeopardize the success of CIIS in the name of selling more MFPs.
Unlike the services transitions that have taken place in recent years, which were made by US-based companies with far less of a reliance on manufacturing, these expansions could bring a significant change in the way Canon USA and KMBS USA do business. While both will continue to operate within the confines of their greater worldwide organizations and still source both printing and other technologies from Japan, they will become inherently more financially and operationally independent as we head into 2012. It is also likely that other vendors will follow a similar path next year, possibly changing way the print industry does business.
So Bored of MPS….
Not really, actually. I’m still very interested in it, but I thought it was an attention-grabbing title and would serve as a good warning that this blog will not be about Managed Print Services. Instead, our latest blog will focus on a handful of notable trends ripped from the Price and Promotions Report Excel cells and Market Intelligence Report paragraphs that gap intelligence publishes on a weekly basis..
I hope the print industry will be ok with one less opinion piece about MPS…
HP’s Big Surprise
For those still in shock over the news that HP plans to spin-off or sell its PSG group as it continues its transition to a services-led business model, a visit to our Data Center should help put things in perspective. A quick search for the terms “HP” and “Acquire” spells it out pretty plainly, HP has placed an overwhelming focus on building its enterprise services and solutions repertoire throughout the last five years, while largely relying on organic growth to drive its already-dominant printing and PC businesses.
That’s 18 acquisitions of enterprise services, solutions, storage, and security vendors (counting Autonomy); six printing and imaging acquisitions; and two PC and mobility acquisitions. And although HP did not reveal financial details with many of these acquisitions, it is a very safe assumption that enterprise software and service’s share of HP’s total investment dollars during the last five years is closer to 90 percent. Just EDS and Autonomy alone combine for over $24 billion in purchases.
Everyone has been quick to attribute HP’s recent spin-off statements to the downfall of webOS, the emergence of tablets, PSG’s profit margins, and the services-led mindset of Leo and his board. And they are certainly not wrong. However, considering that over half of these enterprise services and solutions acquisitions came with price tags well over $1 billion, and much of this funding came right out of PSG and IPG’s profits, it is surprising that more of us did not see this coming.
Note: This section was written before today’s Meg Whitman announcement. However, I do not have any data suggesting that we should have seen it coming.
Color is Catching Up
I don’t know about the dealers in your Dealer Partnership Program, but mine have been moving some serious color boxes. While color’s share of overall MFP sales has consistently grown in recent years, the contracts submitted by members of the gap intelligence Dealer Partnership Program throughout the current quarter brought a very significant black-to-color shift, giving color models a 58 percent share of all A3 Workgroup MFP contracts submitted. Similarly, despite the A4 Monochrome MFP segment’s strong value proposition and fit in many MPS and fleet scenarios, the current quarter also brought a significant increase in color A4 Desktop and Workgroup MFP sales, which accounted for 44 percent of all A4 contracts so far this quarter.
The market-wide transition to color is of course taking place at a slower rate than within my private sector pricing database, as most mid-to-large size organizations maintain an appropriate mix of color and monochrome devices across their fleet. However, the bulk of my dealers specifically target small organizations, many of which only have one A3 device at each location and are generally open to paying a premium to make sure that one A3 device is color-capable. Combine this with the fact that manufacturers continue to look for more ways to make upgrading to color justifiable, and it appears that the SMB segment may be approaching the color tipping point.
In case you are wondering, my dealers’ top selling model so far this quarter is Ricoh’s 20ppm MP C2051 (including its Savin and Lanier equivalents).
Color CPCs Stabilizing, But Way Down
While we’re on the topic of making color justifiable, our public sector contract data shows a significant decline in average CPCs for A3 Color Workgroup MFPs during the last two and three-quarter years. In fact, since the start of 2009, the average color CPC among A3 Color Workgroup MFPs in the public sector has fallen by over 11 percent to just $0.066, while mono CPCs within the segment declined by an also-steep 9 percent. And although color CPC erosion has stabilized overall, the last year has still brought a 4 percent drop in average color CPCs in the A3 Color Workgroup segments.
Given the fact that the average CPC for A3 Monochrome Workgroup models fell at a far-lower 6 percent rate over the same period, it is quite clear that vendors and their various dealer and direct sales entities are digging deep to make investing in color less scary.
While much of these reductions came at the expense of service and supply margins, manufacturers responded with their newest generation MFPs, increasing many toner yields, while only marginally increasing the costs of these cartridges. As a result, the average suggested toner-based costs per page (CPP) among active A3 Color Workgroup MFPs fell by 17 percent. The last 11 quarters brought a similarly-impressive 9 percent decline in A3 Color Workgroup MFPs’ suggested monochrome toner CPPs. Considering that the last few years have also brought cost improvements to many maintenance items, the street-level CPC declines shown in the first chart help to explain how dealers and branches can afford these declines.
ELFA Data: Are We Back at 2008?
At the end of every month the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association (ELFA) releases its Leasing and Finance Index, reporting the key metrics within the equipment financing sector. The report includes statistics gathered from across the equipment financing industry, polling some very recognizable print-related lenders (HP, Canon, DLL, GreatAmerica, BOA, KEY, Wells Fargo) and serves as a barometer for the leasing climate within the printing market. Because of that, during the last week of every month we cover the ELFA’s findings in our MFP Market Intelligence Report (The August 2011 report should be out soon). Although it is often mixed-in with our coverage of the week’s twenty-something other topics, the ELFA does an excellent job in communicating current equipment leasing conditions and I personally find it to be a very valuable addition to our Market Intelligence Reports.
It is also very helpful to take a step back and see where the ELFA data rollercoaster has taken us during the last few years.
Many would be surprised to learn that lease approval rates were actually higher in the last report than they were at the start of 2008, as 76.3 percent of all applications were approved in July, 2011. It would be convenient to look at this data and say the economy has improved to pre-recession levels, but I wouldn’t go that far. I’ve found that many dealers and reps have sharpened their “approvable radar” since the start of the great recession and some of this approval rate resurgence may be due to the fact that salespeople have become far more selective regarding who they approach to lease equipment. The improved leasing climate should of course also be largely attributed to moves our government has made to infuse and free-up capital in the financing markets.
Whatever you want to attribute it to, this is one rebound that I can attest to witnessing on the street level, as an increasing number of my dealers are submitting contracts signed with companies in the real estate and construction verticals in recent months, something that was unheard of a little over a year ago.
It’s a bit harder to draw a clear story from ELFA’s new leasing volume data. Actually we may need to add a few years to this trend before we have a better idea of where we are right now. That said, there are a couple key take-aways from the chart above. Since the recession, the end-of-year highs have been just as high, but leasing volumes during the rest of the year has been pretty dismal. However, for those optimists among us, new lease volumes during the first seven months of 2011 are up 23 percent compared to the same period in 2010, and the pre-tsunami first quarter was up 33 percent year-over-year. To be fair to the pessimists, it should be noted that leasing volumes through the first seven months of 2011 are 20 percent below the first seven months of 2008.
In case you haven’t noticed, the economy is not in the clear yet, but the ELFA data shows that the leasing market is at least heading in the right direction.
Shameless Plug
Once again, all of this information came directly out of our syndicated Market Intelligence and Pricing and Promotion Databases. And for those of you who may not be OK with one less MPS-related blog this week, you can rest assured that there is no shortage of MPS content in our weekly reports.
Seeing a Distributed Future
By now the theory of A3 MFP pages and placements migrating to A4 devices is far from groundbreaking. Most industry watchers have been beating that drum for years and the key printer vendors have touted the A4 value proposition for even longer. We’ve all agreed on the hardware price, page volume, page size, and emerging market reasons behind this transition and watched as the hold-out copier vendors lined up and tossed their hats in the A4 ring, while the key enterprise A4 players grew their market share in leaps and bounds.
However, the role and relevance of big-box A3 MFPs has remained relatively steady for a variety of very good reasons. On the product side, A3 MFPs’ intrinsic usage volume, cost per page, paper handling, and workflow solutions advantages have allowed the copier-based MFP to remain the center of most office printing environments. From a channel perspective, there is no shortage of A3-pushing feet on the street, and although dealers continue to expand to new printing and non-printing technologies, the maintenance requirements of these relatively complex devices play far too high of a role in dealers’ services-led business models to justify anything but selling more copiers. Meanwhile, A3 MFPs offer the level of functionality needed to drive vendors’ solutions-led strategies (whether its push, pull, or just lip service) and the leading A3 manufacturers are far too invested in copier technology to just back-out or change the course of their respective ships.
So there you have it. The economic and technical factors at play within the overlapping A3 and A4 MFP segments suggest that, while A4s may continue to grow share, A3 MFPs will remain a valuable part of the office printing equation for some time.
Now if the world around printing would just evolve at the same pace and in the same direction as it did between say 2007 and early 2010, we’d have this engine format argument pretty much figured out. But something happened in the last 14 months and it may very well have changed the way workers access and print information as we know it.
I hate to bring the discussion back to tablets and mobility, but this is where printable data will increasingly come from, folks. Sure iPads and other tablets have their limits and would certainly not be defined as content creation devices, but the creep of tablets into the workplace that we’ve seen since last May has been funded through most of these workers’ personal bank accounts, providing even more proof that the ITization of these consumer devices cannot be ignored.
We are way too deep into this blog to debate the needed advances in mobile printing or even what will be printed from tablets, which are both very important, and will have their own impacts on the evolution of the MFP. However, it would certainly make sense for us to step away from our speeds, feeds, and CPCs comfort zone to think about the printing experience expectations of the average tablet-owning worker, especially the average tablet-owning worker of the future.
If their device is always with them, turns on in seconds, and offers access to all the information they need with a push of a button, what is the chance that they will have the patience to trek across the office to the centralized copier and wait for their job while the guy in front of them finishes off his 500-page run? Now what is the chance that they will repeat this process a second time?
Lets try another far less hypothetical analogy…
Before we knew what TiVo or DVRs were, we were largely OK with commercials. Some were funny, they gave us a few minutes to actually communicate with our family, and they paid for the programming we watched for free. Now that I have a DVR, I either skip over commercials if the show is recorded or hate on the commercials if I’m watching a program live. We could probably make the same analogies with microwaves, cars, the cotton gin and just about every other technology that came out and shifted an agreed-upon trend off its linear evolution course.
Hopefully this is making sense. We in the printing world want to be the TiVO. We do not want to be the commercial break. Our job is to provide workers with the ability to access and communicate information as conveniently as possible. If the tablet becomes the TiVO, then unfortunately that would make printing the commercial break and workers would either skip over it or hate it and eventually the debate over A3 vs. A4 would be as relevant as Taste Great vs. Less Filling. You know why you remember that commercial right? Yup, no TiVo.
Ok, so now we get to the part that can be hard for us analysts – being constructive. We need distributed work environments. No more walking, no more waiting, and much more accessibility and connectivity. It may not be easy breaking it to your clients that even though their last MPS overhaul resulted in the consolidation of their fleet, we need to spread MFPs and printers back across the office to allow them to print with the level of convenience that they will come to expect. On the bright side, those consolidated printers and MFPs probably didn’t support mobile print anyway.
Fortunately many of the competitive moves that manufacturers have made in recent years to keep an edge in the aforementioned A3/A4 race have positioned the print industry to support the changing behavior of its users relatively well. We’ve seen a continued decline in A3 hardware prices, CPCs, and footprints in recent years, which should allow for more even distribution of these large-size and high-ticket devices across the office. Meanwhile, new A4 MFPs continue to emerge with larger control panels, improved scanning features, and more robust solutions capabilities to address their workflow shortcomings, thus positioning these systems to stand on their own without requiring a nearby copier for more demanding applications.
This convergence certainly suggests that MFPs are heading in the right direction, even if vendors largely made these moves with their competitors in mind, rather than their users. However, given that prioritizing the competition over the client is a product strategy that will only work for so long, I found recent statements from two A3 powerhouses especially significant.
In just the last two months we’ve seen the idea of changing user behavior and the related need to support decentralized printing environments emerge as key components of both Xerox and Ricoh’s strategies for supporting the printing needs of tomorrow’s worker. In Ricoh’s 17th Mid-Term Management Strategy covering the next three fiscal years, the vendor indicated that it realizes that the way businesses view and access information is changing, requiring it to expand connectivity to mobile devices and the cloud and adjust its product lines from expensive and complicated systems to reasonably priced and easy to use systems. Similarly, at Xerox’s recent analyst briefing the vendor suggested that the knowledge worker’s needs are changing to more distributed and accessible solutions, requiring a shift to smaller and more local devices.
I loved each of these statements and was very surprised to see it come from one of them in particular. After years of price wars and market share races, user-centric strategies like this would surely make Gutenberg, Haloid, and Carlson proud. No mention of costs or speeds. No mention of using technology to tie-in services (in these specific statements anyway), just anticipating worker requirements and simplifying their processes. Assuming that the print environment actually does transition to a decentralized structure, it is hard not to imagine that vendors who properly aligned their products and strategies to match these needs will also benefit from their foresight. And Gap Intelligence will still have the industry’s best pricing and TCO services when vendors turn their attention back to the competition.
the pico-letter v8.03 – HP’s Trojan Horse
Considering that HP is one of the clear Managed Print Services leaders, at first glance it can be amazingly hard to envy the vendor’s role in the MPS market because of its massive install base of easy-to-manage and often-consolidated printers.
In a best case scenario, HP or one of its channel partners wins an MPS account that mainly uses non-HP devices, leading to net new hardware placements and pages. However, in basically every other MPS win scenario, the client already has a fleet of HP printers and MFPs installed, so the win really consists of converting some legacy products to its latest models, supplying remaining HP printers with genuine toner, and eventually installing new HP systems as the legacy devices expire or as the client’s needs change. With that in mind, and given HP’s install base before the MPS phenomenon hit, it’s hard not to view HP as having the most to lose from MPS and the least to gain.
In a conversation last year, one of HP’s copier vendor competitors put it this way: “HP may be the MPS market leader, but their problem is they had to eat their own young to get there and will have to continue to do so to keep their share.” Ouch…
However, HP surely views these zero-sum gains as a far better alternative to MPS deals won by competitors, which often begin with an overhaul of the client’s HP install base, followed by supplying remaining HP printers with non-OEM toner and a drawn-out cycle of replacing these legacy devices with MFPs from the competing provider’s brands until the conversion is complete.
This cycle has become so common in MPS that a number of A3 vendors have swallowed their pride and partnered with their natural enemies, the non-OEM toner suppliers, to ensure that their dealers and branches have a reliable source of knock-off HP cartridges. For the same reason, companies have lined up to support MPS dealers’ additional HP-related needs, including service training, helpdesk support, and third party maintenance – providing many of these dealers with a level of support that they don’t even get for their “primary” brands.
Meanwhile, copier vendors are hurriedly developing their own A4 lines to consolidate a nation of HP printers on MPS life support, which will theoretically open the door for them to place their prized and profitable A3 devices. It’s a hard reality…. Just ask anyone at Xerox that was around following the opening of its patent portfolio in 1975. HP is working like heck to maintain its install base and dodge the massive target aimed its back, knowing any misstep means the loss of supply revenue and more of its printers heading to the recycling pile.
However, unlike Xerox’s situation 36 years ago, HP has one very notable and unique advantage. The very forces that are working to steal away its install base have created a nationwide network of LaserJet experts that have grown very comfortable supporting HP technology. Meanwhile anecdotal evidence is piling up that many of these MPS converts are now looking to HP when demand for new A4 MFPs arise.
And why wouldn’t they?
HP’s massive install base did not happen by accident and its brand and technology reputation remain unmatched in many IT departments across the country. MPS providers already have the service and supply infrastructure in place to efficiently and profitably support HP devices. And as of right now, most copier vendors have not been able to provide their dealers with sufficient A4 solutions or have simply brought enterprise A4s to market that completely missed the point of the segment’s hardware-based TCO proposition.
So here we are, in their haste to capture all the HP pages they could, copier vendors have let HP’s Trojan Horse through their gates, and are too busy trying to replace their legacy HP fleets to notice what’s happening. And if they didn’t notice HP’s Trojan Horse roll through the gates, you can bet they didn’t realize that Lexmark, Samsung, and the other printer guys all have their own Trojan horses spread across the channel. Not only that, but it only took me ten paragraphs to work in my title!

I’ve had the pleasure of flying around the country for trade shows and dealer meetings during the last few months and was able to run this theory by some of my friends and colleagues in the industry. And as expected, responses varied according to each player’s role in the MPS equation and provide a solid explanation as to how HP got there.
Below are a few of my favorites:
Copier Manufacturer #1: “It really doesn’t matter because HP will not receive supply revenues from most of these placements anyway”
Correct, but I don’t see that helping this copier vendor as it tries to transition its MPS install base to its own hardware and consumables. Even if HP loses in this scenario, the copier vendors certainly don’t win.
MPS Pundit: “Both sides have it wrong anyway. MPS is not about hardware or brand, it is about managing document workflows and processes, while reducing printing costs”
This person may be right regarding the definition of MPS, but my grandfather would call him a hippy, my dad would call him an idealist, and I would say he didn’t answer my question and isn’t taking the manufacturers’ goals into consideration at all.
Dealer: “I can offer my clients A4 MFPs from other brands for far less and will generally suggest those models, but if a client requests HPs, we can certainly sell and support them.”
Fair enough.
MPS Consultant: “HP printers and MFPs are rarely leased, so dealers that do this would have less control over their MPS accounts and have a harder time negotiating longer contracts.”
My first thought was, you can tell he used to be a copier dealer. My second thought was, you can tell he provides consultation to dealers – not end users. My final thought was, as long as this client also has this dealer’s copiers installed, I don’t see why this is a problem.
Copier Manufacturer #2: “If the dealer choses to continue to offer HP printers, they expose their MPS accounts to too much competition. Anyone can support HP, but once they have their own brand MFPs and printers installed, their hold in the account is much stronger.”
No argument here…. Point taken.

The situations described above are really not as dire for either side when viewed outside of the baby-eating and Trojan Horse analogies. The truth is, nothing is decided. The growth of MPS certainly does not mean the end of HP’s printing market dominance and given the importance of transitioning to a service-led business model, it’s a good idea for copier vendors to do a bit of hand-holding as their dealers evolve from pushing boxes – even if that means (hopefully temporarily) turning them into HP experts.
While HP does not have to venture too far from its IT channel comfort zone, the vendor should certainly try to partner with this growing army of MPS-created HP experts and provide them with a profitable way to become authorized HP experts who buy new HP systems and use genuine toner and parts.
Copier vendors can rest assured that most of their dealers will not immediately become HP resellers just because they now know how to fix them. But that doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t double down on their A4 R&D investments to make sure these MPS providers have a variety of appropriately-equipped and-priced A4 solutions to choose from when it comes time to consolidate their HP fleets. It is also a good idea for them to start looking at A4s as a device that best fits many of their clients’ needs and will continue to do so – not just as another way to either secure or expand their A3 base.
Considering the growing number legacy MPS install bases that will soon transition to branded fleets, the opportunities available to both the Greeks (copier OEMs) and Trojans (printer vendors) are undeniable. Now it’s just up to them to dictate how this story goes down in the history books.
ENX Magazine: Samsung Enters U.S. Copier Market: Now What?
A new vendor entering the mature copier market is about as rare as Halley’s Comet. Only instead of 75 years, we just had to wait one year for Samsung’s first internally developed A3 MFP to orbit over North America. Although the U.S. launch of Samsung’s first A3 line does not come as much of a surprise, the industry should brace for impact, as the Korean consumer-electronics giant’s entrance could be significant.
Up until now, Samsung has carved out a notable presence in the A4 printer space with a respectable line of SOHO-oriented laser printers, strong OEM engine supply relationships, and a fleet of well-liked enterprise-class A4 MFPs. However, with its previous printing portfolio, Samsung was unable to truly support a single line dealer or meet the requirements of most major enterprises or MPS deals, forcing the vendor to accept its role as a supplemental printing solutions provider targeting primarily SMB accounts. It has also become increasingly clear in recent years that copier manufacturers are no longer interested in letting A4 vendors such as Samsung “supplement” their lines, as each major A3 player has either expanded, launched, or is planning its own enterprise A4 products. While the addition of four low-to-mid volume A3s does not immediately change Samsung’s enterprise printing market positioning, especially given its current channel reach of roughly 150 dealers, this launch is a step in the right direction towards the vendor becoming a full-line provider and bolsters its wider-reaching goal of becoming the world’s leading IT manufacturer.
However, Samsung’s new A3 line does face its challenges, as the vendor has achieved much of its enterprise printing success by exploiting the A4 holes in most copier vendors’ lineups. Most of Samsung’s current channel partners already carry at least one far more established copier brand in addition to their current Samsung A4 MFPs, and a large number of these dealers would likely be hesitant to add a second or third A3 brand without notable product-based differentiators, assurance of the models’ reliability, and attractive margin incentives.
With that in mind, Samsung adopted an overwhelmingly dealer-friendly message in statements surrounding its new A3 line:
• Samsung emphasized that, unlike most competing copier vendors, it does not sell directly and therefore will always serve its dealers in a support role, rather than as a competitor.
• The vendor highlighted the oversaturation of existing copier brands in some markets, suggesting that its new A3 models could at the very least provide its dealer partners with brand-based differentiation.
• Samsung addressed the models’ profitability, suggesting that the new A3s are easy to maintain and install, come with a dealer-friendly 36-month warranty for parts, and will be supported with special pricing when sold into major accounts.
Each of these claims were made at the Samsung dealer meetings that preceded the A3 line’s launch and should be viewed in the same objective light as any dealer meeting statements. However, Samsung is certainly correct in addressing the discontent that many dealers feel regarding their adversarial relationship with their own suppliers’ sales forces. The vendor is also wise to reinforce the new line’s ease of maintenance qualities and overall profitability, which once proven, will be the key influencers in the line’s adoption by Samsung’s current A4 resellers and the wider independent dealer channel.
But the question remains: How will Samsung’s A3 MFPs affect the copier market?
Given the new line’s channel challenges, in addition to the overarching theme of falling page volumes and (ironically) the buzz surrounding a shift from A3s to A4s, Samsung surely maintains realistic expectations for the new line’s first year on the market. Samsung’s market share in the above-$1,000 MFP segments has grown in recent years, but remains in the very low single digits, and it’s unlikely that the new A3s will significantly affect that figure right away. However, it is clear that the new A3 MFPs hold both financial and strategic significance for Samsung and the vendor has certainly proven doubters wrong in the past when it successfully entered new and perceivably mature consumer electronics and IT markets. With that, much of the next year will likely be devoted to building the A3 line’s distribution and reputation across Samsung’s current office machine dealer partners in hopes of expanding its dealer network, market share, and possibly its A3 portfolio in the years to come.
While many details regarding Samsung’s premier A3 MFP line are still unavailable, information regarding the new models’ capabilities, in addition to the emphasis that Samsung is placing behind their launch, suggests that the new copiers’ impact could be significant. Although the most immediate change will likely be felt on a micro scale, as the models capture sales that would have gone to their dealer partners’ other A3 brands as well competing dealers’ copier brands, the line’s possible success would likely have much more far-reaching consequences, as it would elevate Samsung’s role and capabilities in the office printing space and likely lead to continued investments and expansion from the emboldened vendor.
Jake Fishman is a senior market analyst for Gap Intelligence, a San Diego-based independent technology research firm with emphasis in helping product manufacturers and resellers understand current market trends in order to respond to customer demands as they occur. He can be reached at Jfishman@gapintelligence.com.
What Does David Stern Know About Falling Color CPCs?
Everyone who knows me well also knows that I love the Boston Celtics. Of course, I have other interests, but the Celts have been a constant part of my life as long as I can remember. I’ve dressed up as Larry Bird for Halloween, I may be the only 30 year old with Celtics slippers, Tommy Heinsohn is featured in my Google Talk profile pic, and the last 7 minutes of the 2010 Finals pretty much ruined last summer for me. So it’s safe to say that I have been keeping my eye on the NBA’s increasingly shaky financial situation and the possible ramifications that a labor dispute would have on the Cs’ chances of hanging banner number 19, assuming/hoping we put banner 18 in the books this June.
With that in mind, I took particular interest in The SportsGuy Bill Simmons’ recent podcast interview with NBA Commissioner, David Stern. The interview did not exactly put my lockout fears to rest, but it certainly provided a clear explanation for how the NBA got in the mess it is in today and raised some interesting parallels with what I’m seeing with one of my other great “loves”, office printing.
The most relevant part of the interview went like this:
SportsGuy: “In the players’ defense, it’s hard for them to realize how bad of a financial situation the owners are in when they saw such crazy deals taking place last summer. I would have thought that if there ever would have been a summer of fiscal responsibility (in the NBA) it would have last summer”.
Commish: “Why should last summer have been different than any other summer?”
SportsGuy: “Why? Because you just spent the last year telling us that the dollars were just not working anymore”.
The SportsGuy and the Commish’s back-and-forth continued for several minutes, bringing to mind the Senate hearing scenes from Godfather II….Yes, SportsGuy as Senator Pat Geary and Stern switching between the Frankie Pantangeli and Tom Hagan roles. Until Stern exposed the NBA’s tragic financial flaw in the following cautious, but very revealing admission:
Commish: “I spent the last year telling you that, overall the league was losing money, but the pressures on individual teams to go out and compete and try to win remains the same…Nevertheless when you add it all up, it doesn’t make for a sustainable business model”.
And that’s it… Much of the NBA has chosen on-court competitiveness over back-office profitability. It would be convenient for proving my point if only the poor performing teams, poorly-run teams, or the teams in regionally-depressed cities were in the red, but money-losing teams are scattered across the NBA spectrum. In fact, you may be wearing the slippers of a money-losing NBA team right now, but I’m not (Celts are +$4.2 million).
“I don’t – I never knew no godfather. I got my own family, senator.”
People from the inside of the office printing industry can hopefully understand what I am trying to communicate through this fun-for-me, but possibly clumsy analogy. Because of the incredible level of competition that dominates the office printing industry, its players do not treat each other very well. They compete with their own clients, slash prices in the name of market share, and encourage their sales people to replace perfectly good MFPs mid-life just to install the latest and greatest, but still very similar models. And then, after all that, the aftermarket guys come in and sell end-users and authorized dealers knock-off consumables. Heck, even MPS, which is undoubtedly the hottest thing to hit the office printing industry in the last half-decade, was at least partially made possible by years of dealers and vendors over-selling their own clients and will have the eventual impact of reducing both hardware sales and page volumes.
So that brings me to color CPCs. Since my first days covering the office printing industry it has been clear that color is king, particularly color pages and the hefty click charges (CPCs) that come with them. Vendors have tried every trick in the book to convert as much of their own install base and their competitor’s fleets to color devices in an effort to capture these high price and high-margin CPCs. But now with every trick already tried or in-play, vendors and dealers have finally begun sacrificing the very click charges they value most in an effort to remain competitive. It doesn’t take David Stern to tell you that this is not sustainable and is not in the best interest of the industry. However, the Commish would certainly understand the pressures that these vendors feel to “go out and compete and try to win”, and that is just what they are doing.
In the last two years I have seen the average office-class A3 MFP’s color CPC fall by over 10 percent to $0.0658 in government contracts, as vendors and dealers slashed the price of color prints in order to make money off of the same exact color prints they just reduced. And based on the changes made to the color consumables used in many of the MFPs that launched in the last four months, it certainly seems like this trend is only going to intensify. As Rick Pitino might say, “10 cent CPCs are not walking through that door.”
Fortunately the office printing industry is far more profitable than the NBA, but in order to stay that way, vendors should make sure that they are on the right side of the line between remaining competitive and driving price erosion. And if you want to know where that line is, Gap Intelligence’s MFP-Copier Report features over 17,000 active MFP contracts (34k historical) with street-level hardware, option, CPC, and consumable prices (current and trended) – not to mention we offer the industry’s best TCO tools. We may just help you raise another banner too.
Office and Production Printing Year in Review
It’s hard to define a year. Some folks may call 2010 a recovery year. Other print industry watchers may call it the year of MPS, the year of services, or the year of the A4s depending on their focus (or bias). Whatever you want to call it, 2010 was certainly quite eventful and I believe set the stage for an even more exciting 2011, especially if the economy cooperates. With that, and in honor of the king of top-tens, David Letterman, I give you the top ten office and production printing themes of 2010 (not necessarily in a particular order).
10) CBS Puts Spotlight on MFP Security
Security has been a major focus of copier vendors for years, but a single 5 minute exposé by CBS News in April changed the way both the manufacturers and clients view the safety of the documents held on an MFP’s hard drive. In the news segment, an undercover team acquired three off-lease MFPs from a New Jersey area wholesaler and within hours were able to extract private information from each unit’s hard drive including medical and police records. One copier actually had original paper documents still on its platen glass! It didn’t take long for local news outlets and the print and online media to take hold of this story and turn it into a mainstream topic overnight.
Before I knew it, my work-related conversations with distant relatives changed from “What’s new in the copier market? My MFP is always broken” to “What’s new in the copier market? I heard they have data security issues.” This really happened…
Although many vendors were quick to call the CBS piece overly sensational (and it was), most of these same manufacturers also swiftly took this opportunity to bolster their MFP security offerings and integrate security into their marketing messages. Within weeks, nearly every major vendor released an announcement touting their largely similar security capabilities and as the year progressed each new MFP product launch brought a higher level of standard security features – most of which were previously offered as options. Many vendors and dealers also began to integrate document security as a component of their overall offerings, either as part of the implementation of a MPS program or as an end-of life value-add/revenue generator.
Eight months after CBS changed the way misinformed second cousins everywhere view copiers, data security has never been as important from both a product and marketing standpoint. And at least for the foreseeable future, it appears that vendors will continue to look to security as a way to create diversification and add value to their products and services.
9) The Yen
Each of my top ten themes of 2010 have been very influential, but if you ask many players in the industry, most would agree that the strength of the yen (strongest in 14 years) has had as big of an impact on their financial performance as any competitive change or event. The same could be said to a somewhat lesser extent for the American printer and copier companies that largely source their engines from Japan, making just about every possible vendor affected by this shift.
1 US dollar = 84.3400 Japanese yen
You could take my word for it, or you could take Canon’s who said in July that for every one yen increase against the dollar, its six-month operating profit falls by 4.7 billion yen ($56.33 million!!). And…in the last 6 months the dollar has fallen over 10 percent versus the yen to 84.2 yen for every dollar.
8 ) The Energy Consumption Race
The speed race (for office MFPs) is over, having a complete line of color copiers is no longer a competitive advantage, and everyone has a third party solutions platform. So how does an eco-minded and margin-conscious vendor compete without just offering a better price or investing to expand their direct sales and channel presence? That’s right, provide a more eco-friendly product and do a better job presenting this advantage through sales and marketing.
Like most other major trends of 2010, the idea and practice of reducing the environmental impact of manufacturing and operating MFPs is not new. However, the technology allowing for greener MFPs and the execution of vendors’ eco-based sales and marketing efforts improved significantly this year. With the introduction of new low-melt toners, increased adoption of recycled and biomass components, expanded use of LED print and scan engines, and a continued focus on warm-up and recovery times, the once obscure TEC rating reached a level of importance that now rivals the printing industry’s previous star acronyms.
Vendors are quickly realizing that many deals require that their sales force support their usual PPM, TCO, CPC, and MPS acronym selling points with feel-good environmental metrics to close deals and hopefully save a couple inches on the polar ice caps.
7) Integration
The acquisition and integration of vendors and resellers has been a major theme in the office and production print industries for many years and 2010 was certainly no exception. However, outside of the acquisitions of a handful of software players, service providers, and regional dealers, much of this year’s printing-related integration activity revolved around Ricoh and Canon’s respective efforts.
Ricoh and IKON
With the acquisitions of Lanier and Savin still quite fresh in most industry watchers’ memories, it is safe to say that IKON is not Ricoh’s first integration rodeo. And although the lessons learned in these previous acquisitions were certainly applied, the first two years of Ricoh’s latest endeavor brought their share of challenges. While IKON’s efforts throughout recession-impacted 2009 were focused on selling as much as possible with some targeted integrations (HR, IT, and UK Production), 2010 was identified as the year to really begin synergizing. On a nation-wide level this integration initially took the form of combining non-sales operations (admin, billing, call centers) and later the integration of IKON and RBS’ regional and area branch management, while the two direct sales entities still function under separate brands (Not unlike RBS and Lanier direct). Meanwhile the assimilation of IKON at Ricoh headquarters followed a similar path as previous integrations, as much of the newly acquired company’s leadership landed in positions at the top ranks of Ricoh US and Ricoh Americas.
There have been some indications that the IKON brand will essentially be retired, which was the case for Ricoh/IKON Canada this summer, but overall the future of Ricoh and IKON has still yet to be determined (or revealed). Regardless of what the future brings for the IKON brand, with most back-end and management integration complete, it is now up to Ricoh to prove that the addition of IKON’s massive sales presence and services acumen will result in a similar increase in sales and more importantly, profitability.
Maybe then Ricoh will ramp up its integration of InfoPrint…
Canon and Oce
Ironically, Ricoh’s acquisition of IKON was also a driving force behind 2010’s other major integration. In November 2009, Canon found itself with a huge channel void following its loss of IKON and some serious hurdles to achieve its production print, wide format, direct sales, and services goals. One thing Canon did have was plenty of money in the bank and almost no debt, clearing the path for its acquisition of cash-strapped Oce and (eventually/theoretically) helping the vendor over each of the aforementioned hurdles.
Canon and Oce have made no secret of the currently integrating companies’ cross-selling relationship and the two certainly put their PR teams to use with no less than 16 related announcements in the last six months. Of course, most of these announcements have been merely formalities, as Oce’s direct sales operations have likely been carrying much of Canon’s office MFP and color production lineup for months. However, there is not much else to promote, as the continued hold-out of several remaining shareholders still limit Canon’s voting rights at Oce to 87 percent. Dutch law requires that Canon must have 100 percent voting rights to achieve total control or make structure-changing decisions and the vendor cannot change its $8.60 per share offer until March 2011. So Canon and Oce will continue to focus on cross selling until then.
Canon and Oce originally targeted a two to three year integration roadmap and it is unknown how this unintended delay will affect their integration plans, but there is no doubt that 2011 will also be an integration year.
6) Panasonic Exits A3 / Samsung Entering?
The A3 consolidation forecast crowd got another feather for their caps in April when Panasonic announced plans to exit the copier market to focus on expanding its line of A4 products. Panasonic will continue to produce new A3s through Q1 2011 and will supply parts until Q1 2018, but you will have a better chance of seeing a Panasonic MFP on a retail shelf than in an enterprise-level bid going forward. You did not have to be Nostradamus or even Yogi Berra to see this one coming, as Panasonic’s investment in its A3 products and channel have been waning for years. But considering that Panasonic’s exit came in the wake of Canon’s acquisition of Oce and a procession of pro-A4 reports, it was hard not to see it as a sign of things to come.
However, rising above the murmurs of A3 consolidation emerged news of a new player entering the ledger size arena. Yes, Samsung. After several years of marketing re-branded Toshiba A3s in Korea and fully exploiting its A4 niche across the globe, the electronics giant shifted its focus to include the copier market with the likely goal of offering a complete range of solutions within the office printing space. In fact, it could be said that Samsung’s full-line ambitions extend beyond printing to becoming a complete IT provider with a lineup that includes printers, computers, monitors, projectors, and servers – and this product expansion is just another step toward that goal.
CLX-9350ND
Focusing on the entry-level color sweet spot, the 35-ppm CLX-9350ND and 25-ppm CLX-9250ND color A3 MFPs have been making their way west, starting in Korea late in the second quarter and reaching Europe by the end of Q3. We are running out of time for a US launch in 2010, but it looks like the new color A3s and possibly 30 and 40-ppm monochrome copiers are on their way. Samsung certainly faces its challenges in expanding to A3 products as it must convince its A4 dealers that its A3 solutions are also right for them and their clients, in terms of performance, value, and reliability – especially given that many of its dealers already carry at least one established A3 brand. However, one lesson analysts across gap intelligence’s various research categories have learned is not to underestimate Samsung when it targets a new product category and A3 MFPs is no exception.
5) Vendors Become the Channels
Call it brand agnosticism, call it a revised channel and product assortment strategy, call it a reaction to all of the channel consolidation and acquisitions, but the theme of selling through other vendors has become increasingly prominent in the last year.
This phenomenon really kicked off in July of 2009 when Toshiba announced a new strategic agreement with HP that would allow its dealers and direct subsidiaries to easily sell and supply HP printers (TABS runs a similar program with Lexmark too). Within two months, HP announced plans to supplement its A4 line with Canon A3 MFPs for its North American and European major enterprise MPS deals. By May of 2010, Konica Minolta had revealed plans to resell Kodak’s DigiMaster production printing systems in addition Kodak’s document scanners (Kodak already sold its presses through Ricoh and IKON). And just a few months back, HP announced plans to sell Toshiba A3s in Asia Pacific MPS deals, filling the remaining geographical holes left by the Canon supply agreement. Combine these agreements with the introduction of Canon’s MFPs across the various Oce Imagistics branches this summer and Oce’s agreement to sell its presses through offset giant manroland just this month and there has been an unprecedented number of vendors selling other company’s products.
Really cross-selling agreements are not all that new, but an increasing number of vendors have come to a realization that these partnerships are a very useful way to either expand their channel presence or product assortment, and they certainly became more popular in 2010. I believe we can expect the same going forward.
4) The Phone and the Cloud
When I first began my transition to the enterprise printing space, a colleague summed up the motivation behind most MFP solutions with a single phrase: “It’s all about building a better funnel between the data and the page.”
This of course proved to be completely true. And it did not take long for vendors to come up with their newest funnels, as businesses finally began to implement cloud services and mobile communication and computing devices approached ubiquity. While access to the cloud from an MFP is certainly not where it will be several years from now, 2010 brought new cloud-connected solutions from a number of vendors and promises of future cloud capabilities from nearly every player. Meanwhile, mobile printing solutions are emerging from all angles, including offerings from MFP manufacturers, inkjet vendors, third-party solution providers, and whatever you want to call Google and Apple.
3) The MPS Tea Party
The MPS Tea Party has transitioned from being viewed as a loose-nit group of fringe extremists to a very influential market force. And the major parties are certainly taking notice and embracing the MPS Tea Party message to gain more votes – I mean place more boxes, capture more clicks, and maintain their piece of the printing market pie.
Sure the Tea Party activists are just now settling on a definition of MPS, and some forecasts by Tea Party “thought leaders” could be seen as grossly exaggerated, but the public has spoken and it’s clear that they want lower costs, intuitive workflows, and common sense printing infrastructure.
Of course MPS is more of a 2000’s phenomenon than 2010-only, but the most hyped printing sales and management model since the metered click is changing the way copiers and printers are sold now and into the future. In addition to the less positive page volume, MIF count, and OEM toner usage implications of this transition, MPS is really forcing vendors and resellers to focus on selling solutions (not just saying it), providing companies with a new level of infrastructure workflow support, and supplying dealers with an unprecedented level of tools and resources.
It will be interesting to see if the grassroots Tea Party campaigners stay true to their beliefs or fall in line with the box-pushing powers that be once sworn in, but you can bet that MPS will make it on my Top 10 of 2011 list.
2) No Ignoring A4s
The writing has been on the wall for some time. Copier vendors have a lot of reasons to include A4 MFPs in their product portfolios. Page volumes are falling, A4 MFP feature sets are evolving, A4s are proving to be logical MPS options for a myriad of scenarios, and the price/value equation of A4 MFPs in many office environments is becoming increasingly favorable. If that wasn’t enough, this year’s market share data removes any doubts, as the leading market share growers were not the A3 vendors that have been snapping up mega dealers and competing vendors, but the A4 vendors with the right products and ownership costs.
With all of these reasons surely in mind, 2010 brought some notable entries into the A4 arena, as Konica Minolta and Ricoh Europe (US soon) took their first honest-to-goodness A4 workgroup MFPs to the market, Sharp refreshed its trend-setting A4 line, and Canon revealed a prototype 50-ppm to 60-ppm monochrome A4. The challenge for many copier vendors will be effectively establishing justifiable TCOs for their A3 and A4 lines to avoid channel confusion and limit cannibalization. But the fact of the matter is that they are going to have to eat some of their own young to build a solid A4 presence.
If there is anything to be learned from 2010, it is that there are a number of hard truths facing the printing industry and the key for success is making sure we adapt to these market changing influences. Just ask H.G. Wells. If that means investing in the development of an A4 line to provide the best solutions for clients and resellers, even if it’s at the expense of hardware margins or the relevancy of low-volume A3s, it’s still worth it. So watch out Segment 1 and 2 A3s, not to mention the numerous printer manufacturers who are about to see an influx of A4 competition, this trend is not going to change in 2011.
1) Shift to Services
With the benefits of IBM’s repositioning as a service company now proven and the results of HP’s acquisition of EDS becoming extremely clear, services quickly became a hot topic among printing industry players in 2010.
Xerox led much of this latest services charge with its acquisition of ACS, adding a BPO powerhouse to its already respectable IT services business and market-leading MPS operation. Less than one year later, Xerox doubled its Q3 profits and grew its revenue by 68 percent, as the company began to realize the synergies and opportunities provided by ACS. 2010 only really marked the first phase of Xerox’s ACS integration and its associated services transformation, and the company would certainly maintain that most benefits of the integration have yet to be realized. Xerox was already fully invested in positioning itself as a “document company” before the acquisition of ACS, but the message is now abundantly clear that Xerox is a services company.
Xerox’s View of the Services Market
Of course Xerox was far from alone, as we saw most other major players increase their focus on services throughout the last year. Dell certainly helped lead the acquisition trend with its 2009 purchase of Perot Systems and has made no secret of its future services ambitions. The always conservative Canon was not in the position to make a services acquisition this year, given its ongoing integration of Oce (which also has a solid services business) and the quickly shrinking field of service providers available for acquisition. However, the vendor certainly expanded its services capabilities with the launch of a cloud-based MPS and IT services partnership with Fujitsu and the initiation of a European enterprise management service collaboration with Accenture. Meanwhile, both Ricoh and Konica Minolta addressed their own enterprise services offerings and pledged to bring new services programs and tools downstream for use by dealers and targeting SMBs. Less than two months ago Toshiba, which already had a MPS operation that far exceeded its market share, announced a reorganization to position itself as a services-led company. And you can bet that Toshiba will not be the last to do so.
Overall printers and pages are still driving most of these companies and paying for their diversification, but it is becoming quite clear that the road they are going down leads to services.
Extending the Life of the Printed Page
As an analyst for the office and production printing industries, so many of the solutions and innovations that I’ve seen have been intended to build a better pipeline between content and printing devices. In terms of driving page growth, some of these innovations have been unequivocal successes, starting with advent of networked printers and copiers, followed by the introduction of solution-based smart MFPs, and although still somewhat unproven, the recent emergence of mobile printing applications has all the makings of the next great content-to-printer pipeline.
However, despite the print industry’s best intentions, it has become quite clear that the digital revolution has resulted in an increased number of pages that remain in digital format and are exclusively accessed by our growing array of computing and mobile devices. Compounding this trend is the fact that the printed page has a much shorter lifecycle than it used to, as printed materials are heading to the shredder or recycling bin in a quicker timeframe and wider scale than ever before.
I will keep saying it. Print is far from dead. However, the ubiquity of computing devices is only going to increase, creating more opportunities for (or threats of) paperless documents and workflows. Of course, vendors will continue to seek out new avenues to drive pages from our constantly growing fleet of information devices, but it appears to me that the current pipeline approach misses one very key aspect of the print experience. Despite all of the innovations made in an effort create more print opportunities, little has been done to promote the relevance of the printed page once it is produced. With one exception:
The emergence of QR Codes has recently breathed new life into the printed page as the two dimensional scannable codes connect a document to many readers’ most prized possession, their smartphone, while directing audiences to the web location of the document creator’s choice.
Scan this Code to Learn More About the Gap Intelligence Dealer Partnership Program
Until now, QR Codes have primarily found the most use in promotional applications such as brochures, magazines, business cards, signage, and most recently retail price tags. However, if made easily to access and use, office and home applications surely will follow. Event invitations can include QR codes to a Google Maps link. Companies that have headers in their documents can include QR codes to their website. Baby announcements can include a QR code to online photos. Business forms can include codes to blank copies of associated forms. Wedding invitations can include a code linked to the couple’s wedding site or gift registry. The possible applications are only limited to the scope of the internet, which is BIG.
I do not believe that QR codes will reverse the downward page volume trend, but I am certain that it is time for print vendors to reevaluate their content pipelines and look for ways to make the pages that are produced more relevant. To quote Andy Dufresne from The Shawshank Redemption, the printed page better “get busy living or get busy dying” and by connecting pages back to the very devices that are relied on to create them, vendors may find their own version of Zihuatanejo.
Panasonic’s A3 Exit – Not a Transitional Milestone
Here in the office printing analyst community, few forecast drum beats can be heard as loudly as claims of the imminent consolidation of copier vendors and the looming obsolescence of the A3 format. These forecasts have gained increasing clout during the last year as the floundering economy expedited Oce’s path to acquisition and the emergence of new A4 MFPs, such as Sharp’s Frontier series, prompted analysts to proclaim that A3s were finally on their way out. Although there is very justifiable evidence behind each of these forecasts, one of the most compelling arguments that both have come to fruition occurred in February when Panasonic announced that it was finally exiting the A3 MFP-Copier market to capitalize on the growth opportunities that lie in the A4 space.
From a 10,000-foot view it seemed pretty clear. With one announcement, Panasonic encapsulated two of the most common theories surrounding the office printing space and became the first milestone in a pair of major transitions that are set to change the office printing market forever. However, as with many apparently clear harbingers of change, the closer you look at Panasonic’s announced transition, the less straightforward the motivations behind it are.
Although Panasonic was never a copier market powerhouse, the manufacturer’s investment into the A3 space was clearly waning for the last five years before reaching its official nadir earlier this year.
On the product side, Panasonic’s actions did not reflect those of a company with intentions of growing within the copier market. Panasonic launched just 12 new A3 MFPs between 2007 and 2010, all of which were closely based on their predecessors and provided no notable specification or feature improvements. To put that into context, since December 2009 Xerox, Canon, and Ricoh have launched 13, 12, and 6 new A3 systems, respectively, and Ricoh is expected to launch another four MFPs in the coming months. Additionally, Panasonic resisted expansion into departmental segments, sat as a spectator as vendors migrated to the light production arena, and never launched a true third party development platform.
Panasonic’s Old A3s
One thing that may surprise folks in the A3 obsolescence crowed is that Panasonic is not shifting its focus to the type of A4s that will theoretically replace copiers. Instead the vendor is planning to expand its current SOHO lineup, launching a variety of new desktop models that will sell through IT resellers, its Panafax channel, and will even reportedly include a substantial retail channel push (and they thought direct sales were expensive!).
Panasonic’s New A4s
Given the market share race and manufacturing scale pressures that face current A3 MFP manufacturers and the hardware cost advantages of A4 MFPs, it is almost certain that vendor consolidation and an engine format shift will continue. However, Panasonic’s exit from the copier space and increased commitment to A4 printers should in no way be viewed as a move from a company that really had a choice. Going forward there are certainly a handful of A3 vendors with low enough market shares and limited enough manufacturing scale that their future may be in doubt, but none are anywhere close to where Panasonic was in 2005 (nevermind 2010), so its safe to expect a substantial slowdown in vendor consolidation until the next recession. Meanwhile, the expected transition to A4 MFPs is already occurring, but it will likely take the form of more balanced A3 and A4 product and fleet lineups as manufacturers look to provide the right hardware solutions for their clients’ needs. It will not be in any way as abrupt as Panasonic’s recent transition – especially not until A4s can rival A3 systems’ usage costs, speeds, and high volume capabilities.



























